Implications of Artificial Intelligence Tools Dependency of Instructors in a Local College

Cleandy Jane R. Obquia, MAEd^1*, & James L. Paglinawan, PhD²
¹Don Carlos Polytechnic College, Philippines
²Central Mindanao University, Philippines
DOI – http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2025.81024

Abstract

This study examines the role of artificial intelligence in the professional and academic work of college instructors at Don Carlos Polytechnic College in Bukidnon, Philippines. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, the research collected open-ended survey responses from seven instructors to explore which AI tools are used, the reasons for their use, the importance of AI in teaching and administrative tasks, and recommendations for responsible integration. Thematic analysis reveals that instructors frequently use AI for lesson planning, assessment, content development, and managing administrative duties. Efficiency, convenience, and new ideas were identified as leading motivations for AI use. Instructors reported that AI helps manage heavy workloads and enhances student-centered instruction, yet they also highlighted the need to review and personalize AI outputs to ensure quality and maintain academic integrity. Recommendations suggest that school administrators provide reliable access to AI tools, develop practical guidelines, and offer regular training. The study highlights that viewing AI as a support tool, not a replacement for professional skill, can help maintain high educational standards and encourage responsible use among all stakeholders. This research offers insights that can support policy development, professional training, and responsible AI integration in higher education.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, college instructors, qualitative research, higher education, educational technology

References

Aquino, S. A., & Lopez, D. F. (2019). Exploring the use of Grammarly and other AI writing assistants in Philippine higher education. International Journal of Educational Science and Research, 7(4), 13-22.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Dizon, R. C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Philippine Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Philippine Journal of Education, 94(2), 107-121.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2013). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2019). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. Pearson.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2019). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(2), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00186-3
Villanueva, M. R., & Santos, J. P. (2020). AI-powered tools in distance learning: Experiences of teachers during the pandemic. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1), 55-63.