Leveraging Online Collaboration for Enhanced Social Studies Cognitive Skills

Julie-Ann Corrales1* & Arnold Abad Tenorio2
1Basic Education Department, The Lady Mediatrix Institute, Inc., Philippines
2College of Teacher Education, Laguna State Polytechnic University, Philippines
DOI – http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2024.7905

Full Text – PDF

Abstract

This study examined students’ perceptions of the online collaborative learning approach and its correlation with cognitive skills in social studies. Fifty students from various colleges at a state university in Laguna were selected using random sampling techniques. Quantitative data analysis revealed that students performed well in online collaborative learning environments, attributing this to positive relationships with group members and a desire to meet group expectations. Regarding cognitive skills, students demonstrated proficiency in accurately evaluating options and establishing priorities. The study found a positive correlation between online collaborative learning and enhancing students’ cognitive skills, particularly in decision-making and problem-solving. These findings suggest that online collaborative learning may effectively develop cognitive abilities in social studies education.

Keywords: Online Collaborative Learning, Cognitive Skills, Social Studies Education.

References

  • Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3).
  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group.
  • Baran, E., & Correia, A. P. (2014). A professional development framework for online teaching. TechTrends, 58(5), 95-101.
  • Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421-439.
  • Barkley, E. F., Major, C. H., & Cross, K. P. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122.
  • Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.
  • Byrnes, J. P. (2013). The nature and development of decision-making: A self-regulation model. Psychology Press.
  • Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799-843.
  • Chiriac, E. H. (2014). Group work as an incentive for learning–students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 558.
  • Cho, M. H., & Cho, Y. (2014). Instructor scaffolding for interaction and students’ academic engagement in online learning: Mediating role of perceived online class goal structures. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 25-30.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 416–436). Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Eun, B. (2019). The zone of proximal development as an overarching concept: A framework for synthesizing Vygotsky’s theories. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 18-30.
  • Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children’s problem‐solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 157-169.
  • Fideli, H., & Aliazas, J. V. (2022). Enhancing Collaboration and Creative Thinking Skills through Technology Preparedness in a Mixed Learning Environment. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(4), 43-60.
  • Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications.
  • Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice. Routledge.
  • Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
  • Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39-54.
  • Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
  • Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2016). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Cengage Learning.
  • Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: Reflections from over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14-30.
  • Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., & Valtonen, T. (2017). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): a framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25-41.
  • Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F. (2014). Evidence for general and domain‐specific elements of teacher–child interactions: Associations with preschool children’s development. Child Development, 85(3), 1257-1274.
  • Hattie, J., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 1-13.
  • Hinnant-Crawford, B. N. (2019). Practical Measurement in Improvement Science. In Improvement Science in Education (pp. 87-108). Springer, Cham.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Creating a learning space in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 24-39.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Chinn, C. A., Chan, C., & O’Donnell, A. M. (Eds.). (2013). The international handbook of collaborative learning. Routledge.
  • Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27-38.
  • Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., Isohätälä, J., & Sobocinski, M. (2016). How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement? Learning and Instruction, 43, 39-51.
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
  • Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
  • Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103-122.
  • Levin, I. P., Bossard, E. A., Gaeth, G. J., & Yan, H. (2014). The combined role of task, child’s age and individual differences in understanding decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(3), 274-286.
  • Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152-159.
  • Medina, M. V., & Del Rosario, A. L. (2022). Online collaborative learning and the enhancement of most essential learning competencies in general mathematics among grade eleven senior high school students. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 3(5), 55-65.
  • Montilla, V. R., Rodriguez, R., Aliazas, J. V., & Gimpaya, R. (2023). Teachers’ pedagogical digital competence as relevant factors on academic motivation and performance in physical education. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 6(6), 45-58.
  • (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume V): Collaborative Problem Solving. OECD Publishing.
  • Panergayo, A. A., & Aliazas, J. V. (2023). Google Classroom Adoption as Learning Management System in Senior High School Using Technology Acceptance Model. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 13(2), 871-883.
  • Quaglia, R. J., & Corso, M. J. (2014). Student voice: The instrument of change. Corwin Press.
  • Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945.
  • Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 527.
  • Reflective Learning. (2013). In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 2835-2836). Springer US.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
  • Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9, 5-15.
  • Scager, K., Boonstra, J., Peeters, T., Vulperhorst, J., & Wiegant, F. (2016). Collaborative learning in higher education: Evoking positive interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar69.
  • Scherer, R., & Gustafsson, J. E. (2015). Student assessment of teaching as a source of information about aspects of teaching quality in multiple subject domains: An application of multilevel bifactor structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1550.
  • Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
  • Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.
  • Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Little, T. J., & Lopez, S. (2015). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251-263.
  • Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer, Boston, MA.
  • Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 785-791.
  • Toshalis, E., & Nakkula, M. J. (2012). Motivation, engagement, and student voice. Education Digest, 78(1), 29-35.
  • Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2014). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 883–898.
  • Wong, Q. J., & Rapee, R. M. (2016). The aetiology and maintenance of social anxiety disorder: A synthesis of complementary theoretical models and formulation of a new integrated model. Journal of Affective Disorders, 203, 84-100.
  • Zelazo, P. D., Blair, C. B., & Willoughby, M. T. (2016). Executive function: Implications for education. (NCER 2017-2000) Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Zhan, Z., Fong, P. S., Mei, H., & Liang, T. (2015). Effects of gender grouping on students’ group performance, individual achievements and attitudes in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 587-596.
  • Zheng, L., & Yu, J. (2016). Exploring the behavioral patterns of Co-regulation in mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1-20.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 145-155.