Improving Animal Health and Production through Epidemiological Studies and Technological Integration

Jonathan Ongom
Independent Researcher
DOI – http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2023.6718

Abstract

Improving animal health and production is critical for ensuring food security, economic stability, and human health. This paper explores the synergistic potential of epidemiological studies and technological integration in enhancing livestock health and productivity. Through a comprehensive survey distributed to livestock farmers, statistical analyses using SPSS, and qualitative analysis with NVIVO, the study identifies common health issues, assesses current health practices, and evaluates the effectiveness of various technologies. The results show that telemedicine, wearable technology, data analytics, and remote sensing greatly enhance animal health outcomes. Case studies highlight the advantages and difficulties of implementing these technologies in dairy, sheep, and poultry production by offering real-world insights. The study concludes with recommendations for developing cost-effective technologies, enhancing data interoperability, and providing better training for farmers and veterinarians. By addressing these areas, the agricultural industry will achieve substantial gains in animal health, productivity, and sustainability, ultimately contributing to global food security and economic growth.

Reference

  • Bronsvoort, B. M., Thumbi, S. M., Poole, E. J., Kiara, H., Tosas Auguet, O., Handel, I. G., Jennings, A., Conradie, I., Mbole-Kariuki, M. N., Toye, P. G., Hanotte, O., Coetzer, J., & Woolhouse, M. E. (2013). Design and descriptive epidemiology of the Infectious Diseases of East African Livestock (IDEAL) project, a longitudinal calf cohort study in western Kenya. BMC Veterinary Research, 9(1), 171. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/33927
  • Freudenheim, J. L. (1999). Study design and hypothesis testing: Issues in the evaluation of evidence from research in nutritional epidemiology. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(6), 1315S-1321S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/69.6.1315S
  • Estimation of foot and mouth disease transmission parameters, using outbreak data and transmission experiments.
  • Neethirajan, S. (2016). Title of the article.  ScienceDirect, Version of Record 24 November 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2016.11.004
  • Nelson, E. J., & Clark, D. L. (2013). Training and technical expertise requirements for advanced animal health technologies. Journal of Agricultural Education, 15(3), 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagee.2013.07.002
  • Roberts, G. L., & Turner, A. (2015). The role of continuous training and support in technology adoption for animal health management. Veterinary Practice Journal, 12(2), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpra.2015.01.0072 / 22
  • Shipe ME, Deppen SA, Farjah F, Grogan EL. Developing prediction models for clinical use using logistic regression: an overview. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(Suppl 4):S574-S584. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.25. PMID: 31032076; PMCID: PMC6465431.
  • Stephen, B., Michie, C., & Andonovic, I. (2013). Remote sensing in agricultural livestock welfare monitoring: Practical considerations. In S. Mukhopadhyay & J. A. Jiang (Eds.), Wireless sensor networks and ecological monitoring(Vol. 3, pp. 115-127). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36365-8_7
  • Thrusfield, M., Christley, R., Brown, H., Diggle, P. J., French, N., Howe, K., Kelly, L., O’Connor, A., Sargeant, J., & Wood, H. (2018). Data collection methods in epidemiological studies of animal diseases. In Veterinary Epidemiology(4th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118280249.ch11
  • Tey, Y. S., & Brindal, M. (2012). Factors influencing the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A review for policy implications. Precision Agriculture, 13, 713-730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-012-9273-6