The Effect of Self-efficiency, Work Environment, and Job Rotation on Employee Engagement and Their Impact on Employee Performance of Pt Pupuk Iskandar Muda

*Ahmad Ghufran, M. Shabri Abd. Majid, & Sofyan
Magister Manajemen, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
DOI – http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2022.5408

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of self-efficacy, work environment, and job rotation on employee engagement and their impact on employee performance of PT Pupuk Iskandar Muda (PIM). The population is all PIM employees, totaling 584 employees. Furthermore, to determine the sample, the researcher used a proportionate stratified random sampling technique so that a sample of 237 people was obtained. The research model was tested using SEM-AMOS. The results prove that self-efficacy, work environment, and job rotation affect employee engagement; Self-efficacy, work environment, job rotation, and employee engagement affect employee performance; and employee engagement mediates the effect of self-efficacy, work environment, and job rotation on employee performance. The test results of this model also explain that employee engagement is a partial mediator, this means that employee engagement can work as a mediator or not in the model. Then the results reveal that the model for improving the performance of PIM employees is a function of increasing self-efficacy, adjusting the work environment, the accuracy of job rotation patterns, and strengthening employee engagement.

Keywords: Self-efficacy, Work environment, Job Rotation, Employee Engagement, Employee Performance

References

  • (2015). Effect of Self-Efficacy on Job Engagement with Perception of Psychological Contract Fulfillment as Moderator. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Sosial, 4(1), 1–14.
  • Ahyari, A. (1990). Production Management Production Control (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  • Albrecht, S. L. (2010). Handbook of Employee Engagement Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice (C. L. Cooper, Ed.). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806374.00007
  • Ardi, V. T. P., Astuti, E. S., & Sulistyo, M. C. W. (2017). Effect of Self Efficacy on Employee Engagement and Employee Performance (Study on Employees of PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Regional V Surabaya). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 52(1), 163–172.
  • Bandura, Al. (1993). Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
  • Baron, R. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Byrne, D. R. (2009). Social Psychology (12th ed.). London: Pearson.
  • Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. A. (2013). Human Resource Management (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Brunetto, Y., Shacklock, K., Teo, S. T. T., & Farr-Wharton, R. (2014). The impact of management on the engagement and well-being of high emotional labour employees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(17), 2345–2363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.877056
  • Casson, H. N. (2015). Lectures on efficiency; a series of six lectures. England: Leopold Classic Library.
  • Chanderson, L., & Suprastha, N. (2020). The Effect of Work Environment and Motivation on Employee Performance at PT SUNRISE POLYBAG. Jurnal Manajerial Dan Kewirausahaan, II(1), 122–130.
  • Dessler, G., & Angelica, D. (2016). Human Resource Management (14 Ed). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  • Ferdinand, A. (2006). Management Research Methods Research Guidelines for Writing Thesis Thesis and accompanied by Management Science. In Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang: Fakulas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Univ Diponegoro.
  • Field, L. K., & Buitendach, J. H. (2010). Happiness, work engagement and organisational commitment of support staff at a tertiary education institution in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v37i1.946
  • Fitri, Y. R., Salfadri, & Sunreni. (2017). The Influence of Work Environment, Motivation and Work Discipline on Employee Performance at PT. Semen Padang. Jurnal Matua, 3(1), 197–207.
  • Gilmore, S., & Williams, S. (2013). Human Resource Management (2nd ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  • Hanaysha, J. (2016). Examining the Effects of Employee Empowerment, Teamwork, and Employee Training on Organizational Commitment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.140
  • Hariandja, M. T. E. (2007). Human Resource Management (Cet. 4). Jakarta: Grasindo.
  • (2016). Human Resource Management: Theory And Practice. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  • Kaymaz, K. (2010). The Effects of Job Rotation Practices on Motivation: A Research on Managers in the Automotive Organizations. Business and Economics Research Journal, 1(3), 69–85.
  • Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. J. (2013). Organizational Behavior Bk.2 (9th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  • Kusumastuti, I., Kurniawati, N. ita, Satria, D. L., & Wicaksono, D. (2019). Analysis of the influence of the work environment on employee performance mediated by employee job satisfaction at SP Aluminum in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Rekomen, 3(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/rn.v3i1.1540
  • Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2019). Work in the 21st Century: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology (6th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Luberta, E. C. (2019). P the influence of the work environment and organizational culture on employee engagement at PT Terminal Petikemas Surabaya. Universitas Hang Tuah Surabaya.
  • Mondy, R. W., Noe, R. M., & Premeaux, S. R. (2016). Human resource management (14th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Pandey, S., & David, S. (2013). A Study of Engagement at Work: What Drives Employee Engagement? European Journal of Commerce and Management Research (EJCMR), 2(7), 155–161.
  • Pringgabayu, D., & Dewi, E. F. (2018). Improving Employee Performance Through the Role of Employee Satisfaction and Engagement (Case Study of Insurance Companies in Indonesia). Ekonomi Bisnis: Management and Business Economics Journal, 23(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um042v23i1p11-20
  • Rahardjo, S. (2014). The Effect Of Competence, Leadership And Work Environment Towards Motivation And Its Impact On The Performance Of Teacher Of Elementary School In Surakarta City, Central Java. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 3(6), 59–74.
  • Rahmawanti, N. P. (2014). The Effect of Work Environment on Employee Performance (Study on Employees of the Pratama Tax Office North Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 8(2).
  • Risher, H. (2010). Don’t Overlook Frontline Supervisors. The Public Manager, 39(3), 74–76.
  • Rivai, V., & Sagala, E. J. (2014). Human Resource Management for Companies: From Theory to Practice (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Essential of Organisational Behaviour (14th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
  • Santrock, J. W. (2017). Educational Psychology (6th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Sarangi, S., & Vats, A. (2015). Role of Emotional Intelligence on Employee Engagement: A Study among Indian Professionals. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(6), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n6p224
  • Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173–208.
  • Setiawan, A. (2011). Analysis of the Effect of Job Rotation on Employee Performance With Work Motivation as an Intervening Variable (Study on CV Sempurna Boga Makmur Semarang). Jurnal Bisnis Strategi, 20(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jbs.20.1.11-24
  • Sidhu, H. K. (2012). An examination of relationship between emotional intelligence, employee engagement, ethical ideology and job performance. Lovely Professional University.
  • Susanty, A., Miradipta, R., & Jie, F. (2013). Analysis of the effect of attitude toward works, organizational commitment and job satisfaction on employee’s job performance (Case Study in Electronic Company). European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 1(10), 15–24.