A machine learning-based QSAR model for predicting phenols cytotoxicity

Latifa Douali1*
1Department of computer sciences, Regional Centre of Training and Education (CRMEF) Marrakech-Safi, Marrakech – Morocco
DOI – http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2022.5305

Abstract

Cytotoxicity is a very important aspect that gains big research interest in toxicology and pharmacology as it is related to whether a compound may cause cell damage, necrosis or apoptosis and this contributes effectively to determine the toxicity potential of a compound and to cancer treatment studies as well. The complexity and the sensitivity of cytotoxicity assays and the involvement of animal tests in many instances increase the need for rapid and reliable alternative methods. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) are relevant techniques that provide mathematical models and help in chemicals screening and in predicting biological activities and eventually cytotoxicity. Because of their capacity to handle complex problems, machine learning contributed substantially to the QSAR field’s evolvement. In this study, we established a predictive QSAR model based on machine learning, namely deep neural network to predict the cytotoxicity of phenols. The model exhibited high performances in predicting new compounds. It was proved that hydrophobic, steric and electronic effects are relevant in determining the cytotoxicity variability of phenols against Tetrahymena pyriformis.

Keywords: Cytotoxicity, Machine learning, Phenols, QSAR, Tetrahymena pyriformis, Risk assessment.

References

  • Zhao et al., “Nutshell Extracts of Xanthoceras sorbifolia: A New Potential Source of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds as a Natural Antioxidant and Immunomodulator.,” J Agric Food Chem, vol. 66, no. 15, pp. 3783–3792, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05590.
  • Liu et al., “Antioxidant capacity of phenolic compounds separated from tea seed oil in vitro and in vivo,” Food Chemistry, vol. 371, p. 131122, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131122.
  • Singh, J. P. Singh, A. Kaur, and N. Singh, “Phenolic composition, antioxidant potential and health benefits of citrus peel,” Food Research International, vol. 132, p. 109114, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109114.
  • Rappoport, Ed., The chemistry of phenols. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003.
  • Nr, “Induction of oxidative stress by bisphenol A and its pleiotropic effects,” Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, Mar. 2017. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28181297/ (accessed Aug. 21, 2020).
  • Garg, S. Kapur, and C. Hansch, “Radical toxicity of phenols: a reference point for obtaining perspective in the formulation of QSAR,” Medicinal research reviews, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2001.
  • -H. Acir and K. Guenther, “Endocrine-disrupting metabolites of alkylphenol ethoxylates – A critical review of analytical methods, environmental occurrences, toxicity, and regulation,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 635, pp. 1530–1546, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.079.
  • Vermerris and R. Nicholson, Phenolic Compound Biochemistry. Springer Netherlands, 2006.Accessed: Sep. 15, 2018. [Online]. Available: //www.springer.com/la/book/9781402051630
  • Bajot, M. T. D. Cronin, D. W. Roberts, and T. W. Schultz, “Reactivity and aquatic toxicity of aromatic compounds transformable to quinone-type Michael acceptors,” SAR QSAR Environ Res, vol. 22, no. 1–2, pp. 51–65, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2010.528449.
  • Gautam, Samiksha, S. S. Chimni, S. Arora, and S. K. Sohal, “Toxic effects of purified phenolic compounds from Acacia nilotica against common cutworm,” Toxicon, vol. 203, pp. 22–29, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.09.017.
  • Wang, P. Xiong, H. Zhang, Q. Zhu, C. Liao, and G. Jiang, “Analysis, occurrence, toxicity and environmental health risks of synthetic phenolic antioxidants: A review,” Environmental Research, vol. 201, p. 111531, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111531.
  • Ma et al., “The adverse health effects of bisphenol A and related toxicity mechanisms,” Environ Res, vol. 176, p. 108575, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108575.
  • A. Yehye et al., “Understanding the chemistry behind the antioxidant activities of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT): a review.,” Eur J Med Chem, vol. 101, pp. 295–312, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.06.026.
  • Arnich et al., “Conclusions of the French Food Safety Agency on the toxicity of bisphenol A,” Int J Hyg Environ Health, vol. 214, no. 3, pp. 271–275, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.12.002.
  • Jomová et al., “A Switch between Antioxidant and Prooxidant Properties of the Phenolic Compounds Myricetin, Morin, 3′,4′-Dihydroxyflavone, Taxifolin and 4-Hydroxy-Coumarin in the Presence of Copper(II) Ions: A Spectroscopic, Absorption Titration and DNA Damage Study,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 23, p. 4335, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/molecules24234335.
  • Papadaki, M. Z. Tsimidou, and F. T. Mantzouridou, “Changes in Phenolic Compounds and Phytotoxicity of the Spanish-Style Green Olive Processing Wastewaters by Aspergillus niger B60.,” J Agric Food Chem, May 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00918.
  • Cherkasov et al., “QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to?,” Journal of medicinal chemistry, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 4977–5010, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1021/jm4004285.
  • Hansch, A. Jazirehi, S. B. Mekapati, R. Garg, and B. Bonavida, “QSAR of apoptosis induction in various cancer cells,” Bioorg. Med. Chem., vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 3015–3019, Jul. 2003.
  • Selassie, S. B. Mekapati, and R. P. Verma, “QSAR: then and now,” Curr Top Med Chem, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 1357–1379, Dec. 2002, doi: 10.2174/1568026023392823.
  • Hansch, P. Maloney, T. Fujita, and R. M. Muir, “Correlation of Biological Activity of Phenoxyacetic Acids with Hammett Substituent Constants and Partition Coefficients,” vol. 194, no. 4824, pp. 178-180., 1962.
  • K. Peterson, X. S. Wang, P. J. Casey, and A. Tropsha, “The Discovery of Geranylgeranyltransferase-I Inhibitors with Novel Scaffolds by the Means of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling, Virtual Screening, and Experimental Validation,” J Med Chem, vol. 52, no. 14, pp. 4210–4220, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1021/jm8013772.
  • Douali and D. Cherqaoui, “QSAR Studies of Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: The Hydrophobic Effect,” Current Computer – Aided Drug Design, vol. 2, pp. 21–29, 2006, doi: 10.2174/157340906776056446.
  • A. Hiller, V. E. Golender, A. B. Rosenblit, L. A. Rastrigin, and A. B. Glaz, “Cybernetic methods of drug design. I. Statement of the problem–the perceptron approach,” vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 411– 421, 1973.
  • Cohen, “Chapter 2 – The basics of machine learning: strategies and techniques,” in Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning in Pathology, S. Cohen, Ed. Elsevier, 2021, pp. 13–40. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-67538-3.00002-6.
  • Douali, D. Villemin, and D. Cherqaoui, “Comparative QSAR based on neural networks for the anti-HIV activity of HEPT derivatives.” Curr Pharm Des, vol. 9, no. 22, pp. 1817–1826, 2003.
  • Y. Yanga, Z. Ye, Y. Su, Q. Zhao, X. Li, and D. Ouyang, “Deep learning for in vitro prediction of pharmaceutical formulations,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 177–185, 2019.
  • B. Hughes, G. P. Miller, and S. J. Swamidass, “Modeling epoxidation of drug-like molecules with a deep machine learning network,” Cent. Sci. 1, pp. 168–180, 2015.
  • Cotterill, N. Price, E. Rorije, and A. Peijnenburg, “Development of a QSAR model to predict hepatic steatosis using freely available machine learning tools,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 142, p. 111494, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111494.
  • Ghasemi, A. Mehridehnavi, A. Fassihi, and H. Pérez-Sánchez, “Deep neural network in QSAR studies using deep belief network,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 62, pp. 251–258, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.09.040.
  • A. Castillo-Garit, G. M. Casañola-Martin, S. J. Barigye, H. Pham-The, F. Torrens, and A. Torreblanca, “Machine learning-based models to predict modes of toxic action of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis,” SAR QSAR Environ Res, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 735–747, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2017.1376705.
  • T. D. Cronin and T. W. Schultz, “Structure-toxicity relationships for phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis,” Chemosphere, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1453–1468, 1996.
  • Selassie and R. P. Verma, “QSAR of toxicology of substituted phenols,” Journal of Pesticide Science, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2015, doi: 10.1584/jpestics.D14-097.
  • D. Selassie et al., “Comparative QSAR and the radical toxicity of various functional groups,” Chem. Rev., vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 2585–2605, Jul. 2002.
  • Tetko et al., “Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection,” J Chem Inf Model, vol. 48, no. 9, Art. no. 9, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1021/ci800151m.
  • T. D. Cronin et al., “Comparative assessment of methods to develop QSARs for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis.,” Chemosphere, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1201–1221, Dec. 2002.
  • Ruusmann, S. Sild, and U. Maran, “QSAR DataBank repository: open and linked qualitative and quantitative structure–activity relationship models,” Journal of Cheminformatics, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 32, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1186/s13321-015-0082-6.
  • Hansch, S. C. McKarns, C. J. Smith, and D. J. Doolittle, “Comparative QSAR evidence for a free-radical mechanism of phenol-induced toxicity,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2000.
  • D. Selassie, T. V. DeSoyza, M. Rosario, H. Gao, and C. Hansch, “Phenol toxicity in leukemia cells: a radical process?,” Chem. Biol. Interact., vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 175–190, Jun. 1998.
  • Douali, D. Villemin, and D. Cherqaoui, “Neural networks: Accurate nonlinear QSAR model for HEPT derivatives.,” J Chem Inf Comput Sci, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1200–1207, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1021/ci034047q.
  • B. Kier and L. H. Hall, Molecular connectivity in chemistry and drug research. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
  • H. Hall and L. B. Kier, “Issues in representation of molecular structure: The development of molecular connectivity,” Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 4–18, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00097-3.
  • Gramatica, N. Chirico, E. Papa, S. Cassani, and S. Kovarich, “QSARINS: A new software for the development, analysis, and validation of QSAR MLR models,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 34, no. 24, pp. 2121–2132, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23361.
  • C. McGowan, “Molecular volumes and structural chemistry,” Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 193–208, 1956, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/recl.19560750208.
  • J. Stewart, “Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V: modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements,” Journal of Molecular Modeling, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1173–1213, 2007.
  • J. Stewart, “Application of the PM6 method to modeling proteins,” Journal of Molecular Modeling, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 765–805, 2009.
  • Chollet, Keras. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://keras.io
  • -C. Huang and T.-H. Le, “Chapter 1 – Introduction to TensorFlow 2,” in Principles and Labs for Deep Learning, S.-C. Huang and T.-H. Le, Eds. Academic Press, 2021, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90198-7.00014-8.
  • Abadi et al., “TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning,” Google AI, 2016. https://ai.google/research/pubs/pub45381 (accessed Sep. 15, 2018).
  • Liu, H. Wang, K. P. Glover, M. G. Feasel, and A. Wallqvist, “Dissecting Machine-Learning Prediction of Molecular Activity: Is an Applicability Domain Needed for Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship Models Based on Deep Neural Networks?,” J Chem Inf Model, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 117–126, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00348.
  • Fujii, Y. Miyajima, H. Masuno, and H. Kagechika, “Increased Hydrophobicity and Estrogenic Activity of Simple Phenols with Silicon and Germanium-Containing Substituents,” J. Med. Chem., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 160–166, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1021/jm3013757.
  • “The Role of Substituents in the Hydrophobic Bonding of Phenols by Serum and Mitochondrial Proteins | Journal of the American Chemical Society.” https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00952a044 (accessed Feb. 21, 2022).
  • Sobiesiak, “Chemical Structure of Phenols and Its Consequence for Sorption Processes,” in Phenolic Compounds, M. Soto-Hernandez, M. Palma-Tenango, and M. del R. Garcia-Mateos, Eds. Rijeka: IntechOpen, 2017. doi: 10.5772/66537.