Reading the Room: Understanding and Enhancing Classroom Interaction with Nonverbal Communication

Fahamida Akter1, Farzana Rashid2*, Nafisa Tasnim3
1,2,3 Port City International University, University in Chittagong, Bangladesh
DOI – http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2024.71113

Full Text – PDF

Abstract

This paper explores the critical role of nonverbal communication in educational settings, emphasizing its impact on teaching efficacy and student engagement. This article inspects how teachers can effectively interpret and respond to the nonverbal cues of students to enhance learning experiences and classroom dynamics. By examining key aspects such as body language, facial expressions, gestures, and eye contact, the article highlights strategies for educators to better understand student engagement, comprehension, and emotional well-being. Through qualitative research methods, including interviews with experienced educators and classroom observations, this piece provides a significant understanding of how nonverbal signals can be used to measure student reactions and adapt teaching methods accordingly. Practical examples and research-based insights are presented to emphasize the importance of developing keen observational skills and creating an inclusive environment where nonverbal communication is recognized and valued as a fundamental component of effective teaching and learning. The findings suggest that by becoming more attuned to nonverbal communication, educators can foster a more responsive and supportive classroom atmosphere, ultimately contributing to improved educational outcomes.

Keywords: Nonverbal cues, Communication, Skills, Credibility, Competence, Effectiveness

References

  • Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Aldine-Atherton.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1992). “Increasing teacher influence through immediacy.” Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, (pp. 101- 119). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
  • Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. ASCD.
  • Allen, J. L., Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (2006). The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: Using self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 23-34.
  • Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57(2), 153-179.
  • Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Andersen, P. A. (2016). The role of nonverbal communication in effective communication”. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(1), pp. 35-54.
  • Wood, J. T. (2015). Communication Mosaics: An Introduction to the Field of Communication. Cengage Learning. pp. 30-40.
  • Franchi, V., & Eble, R. (2016). Voice and public speaking: A research review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 51(1), pp. 16-30.
  • Carnegie, D. (2010). The Quick and Easy Way to Effective Speaking. Pocket Books. pp. 19-21.
  • Reiman, T. (2010). The Power of Body Language: How to Succeed in Every Business and Social Encounter. Pocket Books. pp. 15-30.
  • Pease, A. & Pease, B. (2016). The Definitive Book of Body Language: The hidden meaning behind people’s gestures and expressions. Bantam.