Information System (Is) Models: Technology as a Service for Agricultural Information Dissemination in Developing Countries (Uganda). A Systematic Literature Review

Willbroad Byamukama1,2*, Mbarara Rebecca Kalibwani2 & Businge Phelix Mbabazi3
1 (Ph.D. Candidate), Department of Agriculture, Kabale University, Uganda
2Department of Agriculture, Bishop Stuart University, Uganda
3Faculty of Computing, Library, and Information Science, Kabale University, Uganda
DOI – http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2022.5404

Abstract

This article summarizes the current literature by reviewing the concepts, applications, and development of technology adoption models and theories that are supported by the literature review, with the novelty technology’s prospective application being the main focus. These included but were not limited to, the concepts of Diffusion of Innovations (DIT) (Rogers, 1995), Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1995), and Diffusion of Innovations (DIT) (Rogers, 1995). Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) (Ajzen, 1985, 1991), Theory of Planned Behaviour, (Taylor and Todd, 1995), the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, Bogozzi and Warshaw, 1989, Technology Acceptance Model two (TAM2) Venkatesh and Davis (2000), Technology Acceptance Model three (TAM3) Venkatesh and Bala (2008), Unified Theory of Acceptance Model (UTAUT) Venkatesh et al; 2012 and the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance Model (UTAUT2) Venkatesh et al; 2016. These assessments can give some information on technology adoption levels and potential applications for future researchers to consider, recognize and comprehend the underlying technology models and ideas that will have an impact on the preceding, current, and future applications of technology adoption and agricultural information dissemination by smallholder rural farmers.

Keywords: TRA, DIT, TPB, TAM, UTAUT, UTAUT2, ICT, Information Systems, Technology Adoption, rural farmers, Uganda.

References

  • Bradley, J. (2012). If we build it they will come? The technology acceptance model. In Information systems theory (pp. 19–36). Springer.
  • Chau, N. T., Deng, H., & Tay, R. (2021). A Perception-Based Model for Mobile Commerce Adoption in Vietnamese Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 29(1), 44–67.
  • Chen, S.-C., Shing-Han, L., & Chien-Yi, L. (2011). Recent related research in technology acceptance model: A literature review. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(9), 124.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.
  • Doll, J., & Orth, B. (1993). The Fishbein and Ajzen Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Contraceptive Behavior: Model Variants and Meaningfulness1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(5), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01095.x
  • EL BILALI, H., HASSEN, T. B., BOTTALICO, F., BERJAN, S., & CAPONE, R. (n.d.). ACCEPTANCE AND ADOPTION OF TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE. AGROFOR International Journal, 135.
  • Eriksson, K., Kerem, K., & Nilsson, D. (2005). Customer acceptance of internet banking in Estonia. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
  • Eryılmaz, M. (2021). A Discussion on the Relationship Between Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and Entrepreneurship [Chapter]. Research Anthology on Digital Transformation, Organizational Change, and the Impact of Remote Work; IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7297-9.ch093
  • Fishbein, M., Jaccard, J., Davidson, A. R., Ajzen, I., & Loken, B. (1980). Predicting and understanding family planning behaviors. In Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall.
  • Forgas, J. P. (2003). Affective influences on attitudes and judgments.
  • García-Avilés, J. A. (2020). Diffusion of innovation. The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, 1–8.
  • Kanimozhi, S., & Selvarani, A. (2019). Application of the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour in Technology Adoption: A Review. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(2), 735–739.
  • Kar, A. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Theory building with big data-driven research–Moving away from the “What” towards the “Why.” International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102205.
  • Lala, G. (2014). The emergence and development of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Marketing from Information to Decision, 7, 149–160.
  • Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 50.
  • Macire, K. (2017). An Ict Model for Increased Adoption of Agricultural Input Information by Cereal Farmers in Developing Countries: A Case in Sikasso, Mali [PhD Thesis]. University of Nairobi.
  • Magableh, A. N., & Al-Tarawneh, J. T. (2021). The Effect of Information Systems for Human Resources on the Capability of Individual Innovation in Jordanian Companies: A Conceptual Review. The Big Data-Driven Digital Economy: Artificial and Computational Intelligence, 393–413.
  • Min, S., So, K. K. F., & Jeong, M. (2019). Consumer adoption of the Uber mobile application: Insights from diffusion of innovation theory and technology acceptance model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 770–783.
  • Oladele, O. I. (2015). Effect of information communication technology (ICT) on agricultural information access among extension officers in North West Province South Africa. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, 43(2), 30–41.
  • Oliveira, L. F. de, & Santos, C. D. dos. (2019). INTENDED AND UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF INNOVATION ADOPTION: OPEN GOVERNMENT DATA ADOPTION BY THE FEDERAL DISTRICT OF BRAZIL1. Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Porto Alegre), 25, 1–25.
  • Onyancha, O. B., & Onyango, E. A. (2020). Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture (ICT4Ag) in sub-Saharan Africa: A bibliometrics perspective based on web of science data, 1991–2018. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 20(5), 16343–16370.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations: Modifications of a model for telecommunications. In Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation (pp. 25–38). Springer.
  • Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
  • Vallerand, R. J., Deshaies, P., Cuerrier, J.-P., Pelletier, L. G., & Mongeau, C. (1992). Ajzen and Fishbein’s theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: A confirmatory analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 98.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157–178.
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376.
  • Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.